VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Article on John Smith
From:
Anne Pemberton <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 11 May 2007 15:42:36 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
Is this on the level, or just humbug?

http://vision.stanford.edu/~birch/pocahontas.html

In this article, the author is described as the FIRST historian in 100 
years, to thoroughly investigate the story of Pocahontas saving John Smith. 
Huh?

Can anyone provide a rebuttal on this seemingly stupid assertion? Or, is he 
the first to do so?

Anne




Anne Pemberton
[log in to unmask]
http://www.erols.com/apembert
http://www.educationalsynthesis.org

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US