LISTSERV - VA-HIST Archives - LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

	LISTSERV Archives
	VA-HIST Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: What is the current defination of "revisionist history"?
From:	Anne Pemberton <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:36:38 -0400
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (21 lines)

Herbert,

I believe I am correct in saying that most historians of the last century 
were in agreement that Sumer (Sumeria) was the earliest civilization.

Then, if I am reading a book that dates evidence of cities with public 
buildings and agriculture in Peru to at least as far back as 3500 BC based 
on evidence discovered in this century, would you consider that new 
historical information, or "revisionist history"????

Anne

Anne Pemberton
[log in to unmask]
http://www.erols.com/apembert
http://www.educationalsynthesis.org 

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US