VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brent Tarter <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:49:29 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Randy Cabell asked who won in the discussions about greatst or most
important twentieth century Virginians. We all saw the same suggestions
and reasonings, and there was no clear preference for one or another,
although I think that Oliver W. Hill, whose name appeared very early in
the discussions, was mentioned as often as anybody, more often than
some.

The curious thing is that I began thinking about asking my original
question after two conversations in the autumn with historians, both of
whom asked whether anybody had a more lasting wholesome influence on
Virginia during the twentieth century than Hill. He's one of my heroes,
so it seemed like a good thing to inquire who other people thought were
of the most consequence.

NB: Randy: I didn't mean to suggest that Robert E. Lee shouldn't be
proposed for the greatest Virginian of the nineteenth century, only to
make the observation that for a great many Virginians his name would
naturally spring immediately to mind.

Brent Tarter
The Library of Virginia
[log in to unmask]

Visit the Library of Virginia's web site at http://www.lva.lib.va.us

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US