VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Corneliussen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 11 Dec 2012 09:18:16 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Mr. Barger complained that Monticello's "emphasis...on slavery issues" comes 
"at the expense of Mr. Jefferson." To me that seems upside down. The 
emphasis in fact honors Mr. Jefferson.

Mr. Jefferson matters because self-evident but challenging truths matter. 
It's too bad that Monticello, like the rest of us, failed for many decades 
to begin elucidating and respecting the lives, dignity and contributions of 
individual Americans obscenely oppressed by fellow Americans -- including by 
Mr. Jefferson, the paradoxically slaveholding human-rights idealist.

If Monticello had continued its former Gone-with-the-Windism on slavery late 
into the last century, if the curators had persisted in obscuring Americans' 
lives on that mountain, it would have been the foundation's civic, 
historical and moral negligence that would have come at the expense of Mr. 
Jefferson.

But they got it right. Good for them. Good for self-evident truths.

Good for Mr. Jefferson.

Steven T. Corneliussen
http://www.fortmonroenationalpark.org/
http://tjscience.org/
http://www.physicstoday.org/daily_edition/science_and_the_media

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US