VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Craig Kilby <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 11:20:14 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (47 lines)
Greg,

I don't write the rules, and according to Eric Grundstet apparently 1783 taxes are accepted--I'm waiting to hear about that.  Frankly, I have a problem their stating Lord Dunmore's War was the first battle of the American Revolution and that is acceptable service, publick service claims for impressed property that people were later reimbursed for, and being on the Culpeper Classes list when militia service was compulsory and most of them had a substitute anyway all qualify. But as I said, I don' t write the guidelines.*

Craig

* I could have gone into SAR on a very simple route using either Culpeper Classes or Public Service Claims. But I didn't use a Kilby. I went a very indirect route through Paul Hatch--who had never been entered on the rolls of SAR--because he at least had provable service from Massachussets and "IT IS SAID" was a member of the Boston Tea Party and an apprentice of Paul Revere. I'll never be able to prove the latter, but I do know he was a goldsmith.

On Mar 5, 2014, at 9:36 AM, Greg Carter wrote:

> Craig as a long time member and Past President of the Richmond Chapter SAR, I really have a problem with new members being excepted into the SAR just because their ancestor paid taxes in 1782/1783.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks, 
> Greg Carter
> 
>> On Mar 4, 2014, at 3:35 PM, Craig Kilby <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> 
>> I am informed by credible sources that both DAR and SAR now accept as proof
>> of service during the Revolution anyone who paid land or personal property
>> taxes in 1782 and 1783 as it is said, part of that tax went to pay war
>> debts and is therefore considered one of the "supply taxes" for that
>> purpose.
>> 
>> I can not find any reference in the Nov 1781 enabling act for a "permanent
>> source of revenue" stating any such thing. If DAR now accepts this, who am
>> I to argue but I am wondering if anyone on this list has ever heard of such
>> a thing, or knows anything more about this relatively new ruling.
>> 
>> It will certainly greatly enlarge the pool of prospective members if paying
>> ones taxes in those two years now constitutes eligible patriotic service.
>> 
>> Craig Kilby
>> 
>> ______________________________________
>> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
>> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
> 
> ______________________________________
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US