VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jurretta Heckscher <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 10 Sep 2006 19:15:26 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (49 lines)
Dear colleagues:

The erroneous description of the language of the Records of the  
Virginia Company at  
http://www.interfax-religion.com/?act=documents&div=91 has now been  
corrected.

--Jurretta Heckscher

On Sep 5, 2006, at 9:33 AM, Emily Rose wrote:
>
> It is not surprising that school children are confused about American
> history when
> the Library of Congress Learning Page
> http://memory.loc.gov/learn/features/timeline/colonial/jamestwn/ 
> jamestwn.html
> instructs us that the relevant American “documents were written in  
> Middle
> English”
>
> (for the generally accepted notion that the use of Middle English went  
> out
> in the fifteenth century, see Wikipedia:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_English)
>
> Emily Rose
> New Hall, Cambridge
>
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the  
> instructions
> at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
>
>












\
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US