VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pat Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 20 Oct 2015 08:02:52 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
I have abstracted some of the Loudoun Land Tax Lists.  It does appear that 
commissioners often copied the list of the previous year and then had a 
section of 'alterations.'  In Loudoun these alterations would list the 
previous and new owner/tax payer of the land.

Pat

-----Original Message----- 
From: Paul Heinegg
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2015 2:42 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [VA-HIST] Virginia Land Tax List Entries, 1790s

Perhaps the commissioner did not bother to write up a new tax list every
year but rather copied the previous year's list, making whatever minor
changes were necessary.
Paul

.........

On 10/18/2015 10:45 AM, Wesley Pippenger wrote:
> In reviewing the Virginia Land Tax lists for Prince George County between
> 1782 and 1793 (so far), I notice that a dozen or so people are not listed 
> in
> the general alphabetical run with their acres rather at the back as an
> alteration, but for numerous years in a row.
>
>
> Why would they be listed separately for several years in a row and up to
> five years running.  Could it be that their tax was based not on a 
> transfer
> or ownership but a lease or other right?  I'm trying to figure out why 
> they
> are treated differently.  Wes.
>
>
>
> Wesley E. Pippenger

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US