VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anne Pemberton <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 16:34:41 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
I'd hesitate to go so far as "probably". There was a benefit to the state,
but I wouldn't suggest imputing the honesty of the census takers just to
suggest there may have been a greater number of black slave owners. And,
how would you decide on a numerical change factor?

                                         Anne

At 03:20 PM 2/28/03 -0500, you wrote:
>Makes sense to me, so the free black population was probably underrepresented
>to some extent.
>
>JDS
>
>To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
>at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

Anne Pemberton
[log in to unmask]

http://www.erols.com/stevepem
http://www.educationalsynthesis.org

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US