Very interesting, thanks for posting this. I mostly agree. History
had to be broadened and made more equitable [I shake my head at some
of the things we were taught in Richmond Public Schools] , but it
seems that in many ways it has gone too far. I can willingly
acknowledge my many failing to my fellow humans, the times I've been
stupid and careless, those I have hurt, but please, can I celebrate
my birthday without carrying around a total guilt package? I am more
than the compendium of my sins. As are we all. Hair shirts are never
productive garments to wear 24/7.
Nancy
-------
I was never lost, but I was bewildered once for three days.
--Daniel Boone
On Mar 2, 2007, at 4:32 PM, Jurretta J. Heckscher wrote:
> From another listserv. . . .
>
>
>
> EDWARD ROTHSTEIN | Exhibition Review The New York Times, Mar. 2,
> 2007
>
> Captain Smith, the Tides Are Shifting on the James
>
>
> JAMESTOWN, Va. - At the banks of the James River here, not far from
> where an
> archaeological dig has found pottery shards and remains of settlers
> from 400
> years ago, a proud Capt. John Smith faces the waters and the
> setting sun. A
> wooden stockade extends near the shoreline - the water has moved
> inland over
> the centuries - showing where his frail fort once stood. But Smith
> stands
> heroically tall, his bronze cape seeming to ripple in the brisk winter
> winds. Even the inscription proclaims his importance: "Governor of
> Virginia,
> 1608."
>
>
>
> Governor? Virginia? At the time Jamestown consisted of a paltry
> isolated
> settlement of several dozen souls, with disease, starvation and
> battles with
> local Indian tribes regularly claiming almost as many lives as
> Virginia
> Company could send in delayed relief ships from England, the funds
> raised
> from wary investors. But the Smith statue does give an accurate
> sense of the
> scale of the leadership, strategic thinking, ruthlessness and
> courage Smith
> demonstrated during the brief period (not even two years) he led
> that first
> English colony in the Americas - qualities reflected in his own
> memoirs
> and other accounts (many of which are about to be republished by
> the Library
> of America). Nearby, offering further testimony to Jamestown's
> grandeur, a
> giant obelisk stands, erected, like the statue, a century ago, as
> part of
> the tercentennial celebrations of the founding.
>
>
>
> But now, two months before the 400th anniversary festivities
> begin , the
> monumental hardly matters anymore, and neither, it seems, does John
> Smith.
> Other kinds of commemoration have been prepared. It isn't that
> Jamestown is
> being treated as less important: it is still regarded as the place
> where the
> DNA of a nation was first laid out, where, in 1607, England
> established an
> early beachhead against the expanding empires of Spain and Portugal
> and so
> determined the main language we speak and many of the ideas we share.
>
>
>
> But a different understanding is made explicit here in the two
> historical
> museums and outdoor facilities devoted to the Jamestown theme.
> Jamestown
> Settlement, run by the Jamestown-Yorktown Foundation (a state
> agency), was
> established in 1957 just before the 350th anniversary so the nearby
> historical site would not be disrupted with the Settlement's outdoor
> "living-history" demonstrations, costumed guides, period crafts and
> reproductions of the Jamestown fort, an Indian village and the
> three ships
> that brought the first group of 104 men and boys to these shores. In
> October, Jamestown Settlement added a major 30,000-square-foot
> exhibition
> hall to its new visitors' center, telling an unusually detailed
> history
> of the area through the 17th century.
>
>
>
> Meanwhile the original site, now called Historic Jamestowne, is
> part of the
> Colonial National Historical Park and jointly run by the National Park
> Service and the Association for the Preservation of Virginia
> Antiquities. It
> incorporates the monuments of past tributes - the statue, the
> obelisk, a
> memorial church - but has just added a modest historical
> exhibition in its
> visitors' center, and, last spring, opened a 7,500-square-foot
> museum -
> the Archaearium - devoted to the Jamestown artifacts unearthed by
> the
> on-site excavations, ranging from cooking utensils and weapons to
> bones and
> coins.
>
>
>
> These exhibitions are ambitious and often informative, particularly
> the
> Settlement's, and provide much of the detail needed to begin to
> understand
> Jamestown. Yet a price is paid for the latest in museumware and
> historical
> thinking: One isn't quite sure what is being celebrated or why,
> or whether
> in fact a celebration is even occurring.
>
>
>
> The exhibition created by the Park Service, for example, repeats
> the classic
> tribute: "Jamestown's notable legacies include the introduction of
> representative government, English culture and heritage, and
> Protestant
> religion," all of which had an impact on the evolution of
> Virginia and
> the other colonies. But those legacies also include conflicts with
> Indians
> and the introduction of "race-based slavery." These matters, once
> considered secondary, have become central. Now Jamestown is seen
> as the
> precursor to "a multicultural society grappling with a legacy of
> slavery
> and racism."
>
> Another panel emphasizes the point:
>
>
>
> "Past Jamestown anniversaries were referred to as 'celebrations.'
> Because
> many facets of Jamestown's history are not cause for celebration,
> like human
> bondage and the displacement of Virginia Indians, the Jamestown 400th
> Anniversary is referred to as the Jamestown 2007 Commemoration."
> Throughout
> this introductory exhibition Jamestown is not the beleaguered
> settlement
> cheered on against all odds, but is a hothouse laboratory for
> conflict,
> oppression and perhaps accommodation.
>
>
>
> A similar, though slightly less polemical, vision suffuses the major
> Settlement exhibition, with its artifacts, textual panels, statues and
> dioramas. (Thomas E. Davidson was the curator and Gallagher &
> Associates the
> designers. ) When the institution was founded 50 years ago,
> accompanying
> exhibitions were about Virginia's British heritage and great
> achievements by
> Virginians. Now the theme is: "Three Cultures, One Century: America's
> Story." Jamestown becomes archetypal not because it laid the
> foundations for
> British influence on American political culture, eventually enshrining
> notions of rights and representation, but because it established a
> pattern
> of conflict with Indians and enslavement of Africans - something
> that is
> here homogenized into a more vague multicultural interaction.
>
>
>
> The first major galleries are devoted to the three cultures. They
> include
> descriptions of local Indian tribes (largely based on Smith's
> writings)
> accompanying a life-size diorama of a forest hunt; a depiction of West
> Central African ways of life with a diorama showing a man smoking
> outside a
> hut, a world from which the first blacks in Virginia had been
> wrested; and
> a depiction of an Elizabethan-era London street. The Indians, we
> read, were
> "in harmony with the land that sustained them" and formed an
> "advanced,
> complex society of families and tribes." English society - the
> society
> that gave us the King James Bible and Shakespeare along with
> stirrings of
> democratic argument - is described as offering "limited
> opportunity" in
> which a "small elite" were landowners; in London, we are told,
> "life was
> difficult," with social dislocation, low wages, unemployment, etc.
>
>
>
> True enough about England, except for the lack of perspective and
> the whiffs
> of implied equivalence between vastly different universes. Less
> true with
> its idea of an "advanced complex society" of Powhatans: all human
> societies,
> even agrarian ones, are complex in their methods of organization;
> in this
> case there is little information to suggest much more among these
> 30 warring
> tribes bound by a strong ruler's conquest. The overall impact of this
> three-culture mélange is only to diminish a visitor's sense of
> English culture.
>
>
>
> But finally the depiction of the three cultures begins to seem
> irrelevant,
> because it is never really shown that "it is from the interaction
> of these
> different cultural traditions that 17th century Virginia society
> was born."
>
> In what way, for example, apart from name places and types of food,
> was
> Powhatan culture a major influence on Virginia society? The
> continued state
> of conflict with the Indians was a major influence, in which
> negotiations,
> accommodations and episodes of trade were punctuated with battle. That
> conflict was not a simple matter. It was a confrontation between
> alien and
> opposing cultures possessing unequal powers, a conflict that has
> accompanied most cultures' migratory histories, from ancient times
> to our own.
>
>
>
> As for the influence of West Central African culture, with its
> described
> political hierarchies, and its own internal history of enslavement
> through
> conquest (referred to in the exhibition's text), it is also
> difficult to see
> just how Angolan or Kongo culture shaped early-17th-century
> Virginia. Even
> in later years the cultures created by American slaves are not
> replications
> of African cultures but distant echoes of it, something hinted at
> in one of
> the exhibition's later galleries.
>
>
>
> During the entire formative period of Jamestown - from 1607
> through 1619,
> when the nature of the settlement was established and its economy
> finally
> began to find a footing with the growing of tobacco - there were no
> Africans in Virginia at all. The first black chattel servants were
> brought
> to Jamestown during that latter year almost by accident, just as
> representative democracy was also being established. These unfortunate
> 20-some prisoners were looted during a piratical English attack on a
> Portuguese slave ship. Systematic slavery doesn't appear to begin in
> Virginia for decades.
>
>
>
> So the idea of mutual interaction is not too convincing. Still,
> there is
> much to learn in the exhibition's unfolding: it touches on the
> European
> drive for colonial power, on sea navigation, the establishment of
> Jamestown,
> the story of Pocahontas, conflicts with Indians, the discovery of
> tobacco as
> a major source of income leading to the development of Virginia's
> gentlemen
> farmers (and the drive toward the importation of slaves), the
> evolution of
> Virginia's legislature. But John Smith's extraordinary interactions
> with the
> Powhatan chief - matching him as a wary warrior and negotiator
> - are not
> explored. The dominant statues in the exhibition galleries are of the
> Powhatan rulers, Wahunsonacock and Opechancanough, along with the
> African
> Ndongo ruler, Queen Njinga, who fought against the Portuguese and
> from whose
> lands the first blacks brought to America were pulled.
>
>
>
> So what exactly is being celebrated here? A closing gallery makes some
> suggestions: "Principles of Law and Justice," "Exploration and
> Discovery,"
> "Representative Government." But also "Displacement of Indigenous
> People"
> and "Servitude and Injustice." What a change from the Tercentennial
> when
> Jamestown was the symbol of America's birth and President Theodore
> Roosevelt, Mark Twain and Booker T. Washington spoke. On the 350th
> anniversary Queen Elizabeth II made her first royal trip to the United
> States, and she is expected to come this time as well. But what
> will she
> find? Not the triumph of British influence, but the triumph of
> ambiguity,
> discomfort and vague multiculturalism.
>
>
>
> Of course much has changed in 50 years; much had to. Those 1957
> celebrations
> themselves provided evidence of the sins of the past: the Virginia
> Chamber
> of Commerce withdrew some invitations to festivities after it found
> out they
> were sent to distinguished Virginians who happened to be black.
> Clearly too
> it is impossible to understand Jamestown without understanding the
> fate of
> Indian tribes. And, despite its flaws, the Settlement's exhibition
> does much
> to spur a greater understanding of Jamestown.
>
>
>
> But the impulse to commemorate rather than celebrate is a sign of how
> rigidly the Jamestown affair and its aftermath are now being
> seen. And
> unfortunately an extraordinary culture unable to celebrate itself
> and its
> past, with all its imperfections and failings, is not likely
> to have a
> clear vision of the present and future.
>
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the
> instructions
> at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
|