VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:29:07 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (63 lines)
The evidence comes from those former slaves who were 
interviewed twice.  When we compare the interviews given by 
the same person to white and black interviewers, the 
difference is usually quite remarkable.  In the 1930s, 
elderly black men and women tended to tone down their 
recollections of the depravity of slavery in favor of more 
benign stories.  They were not necessarily lying, since like 
everyone else they had happy moments in their lives as well 
as brutal or tragic ones.  They talked about the happy 
things to the white interviewrs, and gave more balanced 
accounts to black interviewers.  

Slavery rested on violence.  *Some* violence was necessary 
to make the system work.  That does not mean that every 
slave, every day, was subject to violence.  Indeed, studies 
of plantation violence demonstrate that it was rarer than 
you might think.  But then, how much exemplary violence does 
it take to instill fear?  It might be as few as the one or 
two public whippings per year that seem to have been the 
norm on most large southern plantations (if I am remembering 
the data from TIME ON THE CROSS accurately).  

The Virginia slave narratives--and they, after all, are what 
concern us on this list-serv--are quite clear on this.  More 
than half of the former slaves interviewed recalled various 
forms of fairly extreme violence used on slaves.  

All best,
Kevin

---- Original message ----
>Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 09:34:08 EST
>From: Basil Forest <[log in to unmask]>  
>Subject: Re: Slave Narrative for WPA Project  
>To: [log in to unmask]
>
>What's the basis for the belief that the WPA former slave 
interviewees were  
>dishonest in their views on slavery over fear of the "white 
man"?  Is this  
>the PC way to dismiss the evidence to the contrary on the 
treatment of some  
>slaves by their owners and the apparent benevolent feelings 
of the slaves toward  
>their previous lifestyle post-war and freedom?
> 
> 
><BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL 
now offers free 
>email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free from 
AOL at 
>http://www.aol.com.
>
>To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see 
the instructions
>at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
Kevin R. Hardwick, Ph.D.
Department of History
James Madison University

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US