I have no interest in adding to the ad hominem attacks already over prevalent in this list serv.  But I stand by my judgment that there are people who post regularly who are  uncivil and unnecessarily crass.  

So with respect, Tom, no, I will not identify the people whom I had in mind.   

I will say that I would like to see the incivility end.  But I fail to see how using a vague term like "usual suspects" is either uncivil or crass.

Let's talk about Virginia history, shall we?

All best,
Kevin

---- Original message ----
>Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:29:21 -0400
>From: Excalibur131 <[log in to unmask]>  
>Subject: Usual Suspects  
>To: [log in to unmask]
>
>While going through the oodles of email I received from the VA-HIST List
>this evening, I noticed that Kevin R. Hardwick and Barbara Vines Little used
>the phrase "usual suspects." Would someone please identify the "usual
>suspects?" Then we might all have some assurance that we are operating from
>the same page.
>
>Tom
>Eastern Shore & More
>http://easternshoremore.com
>
>______________________________________
>To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
>http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
Kevin R. Hardwick, Ph.D.
Department of History
James Madison University

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html