VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Guardian Selection in Colonial Va
From:
"Tarter, Brent" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 29 Aug 2019 09:10:40 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines) 
My understanding (and I was reading Tucker's Blackstone on this earlier in
the week) is that both must be true.

Brent Tarter
[log in to unmask]


On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 8:19 AM Douglas Burnett <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> In 1751 Va if a son chose his mother as his guardian would that not infer
> that:
> (1) Father is deceased or assumed to be deceased?
> (2) Son is at least 14 years old?
> This occurred 6 May 1751 in Chesterfield County Va.
>
> --
> Douglas Burnett
> Satellite Beach
> FL
>
> ______________________________________
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
>
> This list is made possible by a grant from the U.S. Institute of Museum
> and Library Services (IMLS).
>

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

This list is made possible by a grant from the U.S. Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US