Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:17:36 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
My own opinion is that a book should be a work of historical fact, or historical fiction, but it cannot be both.* To quote a work that is historical fiction as historical fact is a bad mistake.
Craig Kilby
*This is not to say that work of historical fact cannot be written in an engaging manner, as those who know me well can attest
On Oct 17, 2012, at 5:15 PM, John Maass wrote:
> Is not Jan Lewis being a bit overblown when she faults the author for saying that Monticello was above the clouds? It is an obvious literary device, and I doubt it is meant to be taken literally by the author. Some of Jefferson's visitors also described the spot in similar terms, if I am not mistaken. If Lewis can't recognize this kind of writing, esp. in an intro., I'd hate to read one of her books....
>
> John Maass, Ph.D.
> 614-506-9537 (c)
> New book project: http://tinyurl.com/93ahom4
>
> ______________________________________
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
|
|
|