LISTSERV - VA-HIST Archives - LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

	LISTSERV Archives
	VA-HIST Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Condense Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Content-Type:	text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
Date:	Fri, 25 Jan 2013 22:32:02 -0000
Reply-To:	Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:	01252230Z13 Re: 01251930Z13 Re: 01242232Z13 Patton And Re: Rommel
MIME-Version:	1.0
Message-ID:	<E41EB1F2CC374DEFABC8271CBE3AB55D@computer>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:	7bit
Sender:	Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
From:	Walter Waddell <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (17 lines)

Taking you explanation or exploration into the causes of a very "murky" 
event; fact ("unmurky": Mosby shot and wounded another, it is plain that D'este 
made a serious error in mislabeling Mosby as a "killer" - influencing a 
youngster. A lesson for consideration for investigators of "pre modern" (Pre 
1900 - my own arbitrary assignment) personalities attempting to tie orbiting 
characters to their "biographical sketch".

That brings into wonder, the degree of "heft" of D'este's overall work or 
was it just an isolated anomaly of otherwise studied research? Unless 
further advised, I shall give the benefit of doubt to D'este.

Regards, Ray

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US