LISTSERV - VA-HIST Archives - LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

	LISTSERV Archives
	VA-HIST Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: SCIREFACIAS in 1755
From:	Diana Bennett <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:34:08 -0400
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (13 lines)

Dear Marilyn:

>Sometimes it was used as a way of proceeding against the person who was the bail for the defendeant. >

 -- "the person who was the bail for the defendant." -- Does this mean
that he was representing the defendant...I am trying to find out if
Samuel Kercheville was the debtor or representing the debtor...

Thanks,   Diana

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US