Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 11 Jan 2002 08:32:42 -0400 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Spelling: Daguerreotype. Developed in 1839 in France (not Virginia), but
Daguerre (and Niepce, his collaborator) also published his process widely;
by the end of the year even, Daguerreotypes were produced almost literally
around the world (I wouldn't be surprised if it reached Virginia, but it
wasn't developed here). A competeing process (the calotype) was developed
the same year in England by Talbot, but lacked the Daguerreotype's fine
texture. Chief drawback to the Daguerreotype was that it was unique -- no
way to duplicate prints.
By the Civil War, however, this issue is moot. Both processes were
overtaken by new innovations -- in the 1850s, the collodion or wet-plate
process became the standard. This included glass plate negatives
(inabling innumerable prints), but it was a laborious process -- you
basically had to carry your darkroom with you. Civil War era
photographers -- almost all -- used this process. [a dry plate process
was then developed about a decade after the war; Kodak cameras -- "you
press the button, we do the rest" came along still later in the 19th
century.]
Michael Trotti
Ithaca College
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
|
|
|