Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 2 Jul 2009 22:35:45 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
<5836A02070A44D2E91BCB55EB488F153@powell> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I would consider the difference between planter and (non-tenant) farmer
to be a combination of self perception
and regional differences. We still have this sort of difference today
here in the U.S.: for instance,
in most of the South, acreage devoted to any sort of agriculture,
whether hobby or business, is a
"farm," while, in the West, the same sort of acreage would be a "ranch."
(Defining what is "South" and
what is "West" can be another measure of self perception.)
I have seen the differences between planter and non-tenant farmer in
several censuses of the state
of South Carolina: even after 1865, a "planter" tended to live east of
the state's piedmont ("Upstate")
and a non-tenant farmer was more likely to live in the piedmont.
Elizabeth Whitaker
M.A., History (2006)
Independent Scholar
Alexandria, VA
Hannah Powell wrote:
> Would you say then, that many of these terminologies such as Planter,
> Farmer, et al, may be simply a matter of "self perception" or of how a
> person was perceived in his local area?
> Hannah Powell
>
______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
|
|
|