Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 19 Oct 2012 14:53:36 +0000 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes |
In-Reply-To: |
<D38E5F640BDB48A692FEB7ECAC486947@computer> |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
base64 |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Kevin and John are right that my query had to do with the juxtaposition of
the 1776 Va Declaration of Rights and Va Constitution of 1776.
We frankly know a great deal more about the antecedents and drafting of the
Bill of Rights appended to the US Constitution - though the question
of 'placement' came up in the latter process, too. -- only the question was
whether to disperse the amendments at appropriate places throughout the
text of the current US Constitution or (as was decided) append them at the
end. (In fact I rummaged through several of the major works on the B of
Rights and ran a couple of JSTOR searches before posting the query).
James Madison did have a significant role in the drafting of the Va
Declaration of Rights - although as he points out in his autobiography he
was young (just barely 25) and it was his first time in office beyond
Orange County and he said little or nothing in debates ... but he DID press
for the significant change in the clause about religious liberty - and
successfully replaced Mason's language about _toleration_ with a full-blown
commitment to religious liberty.
Still, on the matter of placing the Declaration of Rights before the
Constitution, the convention had decided upon that in the May 15th
resolution, in language introduced by Meriwether Smith and retained by
Pendleton, three days before Mason (delayed by gout) arrived in Wmsburg and
without, according the evidence we have, any participation by Madison.....
And of course my query goes to the question of antecedents that might have
influenced Smith.
All best,
jk
On , Walter Waddell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> With no intent of being flippant, one would have trouble becoming
> authoritatively conversant on the inclusion of the Bill of Rights, let
> alone its “placement”, in our Constitution without first studying
> “Madison's Notes” for the purpose of understanding the complexity of the
> debate about the “Constitutional” idea itself.
> To the more specific: From my readings, “advocacy” for inclusion of a
> “Bill of Rights” was widely held as these leaders of that time were aware
> of and in admiration of the ideas that were coming from the “Scottish”
> intellectuals and other Europeans: reasoning that the individual
> “transcended” the “mob“.
> As to who said it first: your message seems to have "nailed the jelly to
> the tree" absent further citations.
> I shall follow this "thread" with interest.
> Regards, Ray
> ______________________________________
______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
|
|
|