Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v753) |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed |
Date: |
Thu, 1 May 2008 21:20:36 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
<007001c8abef$c31efae0$6401a8c0@yourkgltv8arfm> |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Nothing...you have it precisely. The Hemings issue will almost
certainly be settled indisputably by more advanced science. The DNA
test done is already dated. Taken as a whole it is the story of a
human being the consensus of history has chosen to preserve.
-- Stephan
On 1 May 2008, at 20:59, Diane Ethridge wrote:
> With all due respect to the historians, educators, authors & other
> list members, I'm having a difficult time understanding why the
> circumstances of Jefferson's private life are of any particular
> importance or interest to anyone but the families of the deceased
> parties involved in this personal situation that happened so many
> years ago. It isn't exactly "breaking news" that he owned slaves,
> was a single man at the time and she was attractive, vulnerable
> and available with few consequences as a result of the liaison.
> Also, not a startling fact is that he isn't the first president,
> nor will he be the last, who fell from earthly "grace" because of
> his human condition. He was a man of his day & time,
> extraordinarily gifted in so many ways but still a fallible
> being...period. What am I missing as to the reason for this huge
> interest in this subject?
>
> Thanks,
> D. Ethridge
> TX
>
>
> ______________________________________
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the
> instructions at
> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
|
|
|