Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 5 Dec 2005 20:33:41 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
With the TJ/Hemings issue in full conflagration again, I would like to roll
back to Jurretta Heckscher's eloquent post on GW. She wrote: "I would argue
that Washington . . . must be presumed to have believed almost inevitably
in white racial superiority. That was, quite simply, one of the bedrock
foundations of the world that made and sustained him--and if he broke
extensively with that belief in his own mind, as I at least would need to
see demonstrated by an unambiguous pronouncement."
He did break with that world by freeing his slaves and he did make a
"pronouncement" in his will, in which he not only freed his slaves but
specified that they be taught to read & write, be "brought up to some useful
occupation," and further ordered that no slave be transported out of
Virginia "under any pretence whatsoever." This is my interpretation of that
pronouncement: Washington believed that blacks had a right to freedom; that
formerly enslaved blacks were quite amenable to education and training;
furthermore, he clearly believed that they had a claim to education and
decent work; finally, he seems to have believed that with education and
training the freed children of slaves could immediately take a fruitful and
productive place in Virginia society as free people because he emphatically
specified that no one should be exiled. I don't think a racist of the 1790s
variety would write such a will.
Henry Wiencek
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
|
|
|