 
| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Sat, 28 Feb 2009 07:49:49 -0500 |
| MIME-version: |
1.0 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| In-Reply-To: |
<F403442322F64CA88B0086E2ED44F989@Pemberton> |
| Content-disposition: |
inline |
| Content-transfer-encoding: |
quoted-printable |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Good question. These data are for white women born in Maryland. Data on slave fertility are harder to come by, but the research of Allan Kulikoff and a few others show similar fertility rates for American-born slave women (from the mid-18th century on), only more died before their childbearing years were up, so completed family size was smaller; also, a larger fraction of their children died before reaching the age of 20 (mostly in infancy or early childhood).
Doug Deal
History/SUNY Oswego
----- Original Message -----
From: Anne Pemberton <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Friday, February 27, 2009 10:40 pm
Subject: Re: 18th century fertility rate in Virginia
To: [log in to unmask]
> Doug,
>
> Your data is interesting. But, I have to ask if the data is only
> for white
> women, for black women, or combined for both.
>
> Anne
>
> Anne Pemberton
> [log in to unmask]
> http://www.erols.com/apembert
> http://www.educationalsynthesis.org
>
> ______________________________________
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the
> instructions at
> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
|
|
|
