 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes |
| Date: |
Sat, 1 Nov 2008 22:17:34 -0400 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| In-Reply-To: |
<0C6CFFE24FCA40EF84B0AF98BC96C079@Pemberton> |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Sender: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
And that is precisely why you cannot base an argument on it. Jeez.
This need not be argued on the list, either.
Lyle
On Nov 1, 2008, at 10:11 PM, Anne Pemberton wrote:
> Lyle,
>
> You are making the claim for possible, and I am making the claim for
> probable. Yes, I know that recessive genes came come back. That is
> why I question how Sally's children, with anymore black blood than
> is assumed with her partnering with white males, did not come out
> with at least one or two considerably darker. With six children, you
> have a pretty nice-sized sample. The fact that is didn't happen
> makes it improbable to me that a slave, who added to the black
> parentage of the children, could have fathered such white-looking
> children.
>
> It may be possible. But is it probable?
>
> Anne
>
> Anne Pemberton
> [log in to unmask]
> http://www.erols.com/apembert
> http://www.educationalsynthesis.org
> ______________________________________
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the
> instructions at
> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
|
|
|
