Is this on the level, or just humbug? http://vision.stanford.edu/~birch/pocahontas.html In this article, the author is described as the FIRST historian in 100 years, to thoroughly investigate the story of Pocahontas saving John Smith. Huh? Can anyone provide a rebuttal on this seemingly stupid assertion? Or, is he the first to do so? Anne Anne Pemberton [log in to unmask] http://www.erols.com/apembert http://www.educationalsynthesis.org
LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US