Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 1 Oct 2008 23:15:11 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=response |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Anne, your 'off the wall' multi-faceted rant to Herb, and prior ones, leads
me to address all of your points very directly, one by one, just as A.G-R
did when she responded to Herb's questions at her book bally-hoo for
Washington Post, and at prior times:
You are just wrong in so many ways, too many ways for me to begin to state.
If I tried with all my powers, I could not begin to exaggerate how wrong you
are. You can't have read any of my postings, certainly not the ones that
just came out a week and you resonded vehemently for days after that. I have
never said I believe I believe you. No one who has read my postings could
ever claim that and certainly not one who read the second. I am not
attacking you. I think you are among the greatest VA-HIST posters who ever
lived, including your many flaws and being absolutely wrong-minded and all.
Period.
Neil McDonald
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anne Pemberton" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 9:03 PM
Subject: Re: [VA-HIST] What is the current defination of "revisionist
history"?
> Herbert,
>
______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
|
|
|