Sender: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:44:19 -0500 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7BIT |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Paul Finkelman wrote:
> You are right here; why people want to believe this nonsense is
> fabulously interesting; that people do believe it, and resist all
> evidence to contrary, is deeply tragic.
>
>
There is a very good book that sheds much light on this apparent puzzle
("why people believe the darndest things..."). It is David Lowenthal's
Possessed by the Past: The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History.
In the book, Lowenthal explores the huge differences (and the overlap)
between history and heritage. The latter is an amalgam myth, legend,
wishful thinking, sheer invention, and scraps of actual history that is
fabricated to shore up collective or group identity. A heritage can be
shared by an entire country or by any sort of smaller group for which
solidarity and self-esteem matter. As Lowenthal notes, "Heritage thrives
on persisting error. 'Getting its history wrong is crucial for the
creation of a nation,'" according to French nationalist Ernst Renan.
I recommend the book to all. There is also a good article by Lowenthal
available online. It appears in the periodical History and Memory and is
entitled "Fabricating Heritage." The "quilt code" fits the heritage
mold to a "t."
Doug Deal
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
|
|
|