VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date:
Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:46:53 -0600
Reply-To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Michael Nicholls <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
I am not sure of the number within the total number of justices appointed in each county, but the justices who made up the quorum were the most senior ones appointed. To conduct county business I believe that at least 4 justices had to sit, one of whom had to be from among the quorum or most senior members--Mick Nicholls
On Oct 14, 2010, at 1:13 PM, Craig Kilby wrote:

> Question for all. I am reading an endnote (#294, p. 178) to Edward Porter Alexander's *The Journal of John Fontaine*. He says here about James Fontaine in King William County that "he served on the quorum."  Quorum of what? This would be between 1718 and 1735.
> 
> Craig Kilby
> 
> "
> ______________________________________
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
> http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US