VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Despondent
From:
Excalibur131 <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 3 Apr 2008 18:25:27 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines) 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Vejnar Robert J." <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: Despondent

<snip>
Digitization is fine for making documents accessible, but it is NOT the 
answer to long-term preservation.
<snip>

Robert Vejnar

----------

Why not approach the two subjects from different directions? Is there some 
law that says document accessibility and long-term preservation shall be 
tied together? Can progress be made on one while awaiting a solution to the 
other? Can progress be made on both, albeit slower, simultaneously?

Tom
Eastern Shore & More
http://easternshoremore.com

______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US