Herb,
Thanks for the recommended reading list. I suspect that the Jefferson
apologists have little or nothing new to add to the discussion that you,
yourself, have not stated. HERB: We shall see
The fact remains that Jefferson stands indicted on the very old element
of
guilt by circumstantial evidence, a matter of legal assignment of guilt
that
have sent many a man to prison or to his death. Motive, his sexual needs
at
the time, and Opportunity, being on site when the woman became pregnant,
are obvious. HERB: You, me or any of the authorities and experts do not
know where Sally was do we?
And, I will repeat again, that if these allegations are all "lies" and
that
it was other Jeffersons who committed the acts, that Jefferson was then
a
PIMP for his favored maid. HERB: You don't know what the Randolph/Sally
relationship was (he wasn't married at the time), so why try to imply
lewd remarks about a great founding father that certain politically
correct people wish to destroy. Stick to your cheap soap opera writing
and maybe you and AGR can co-produce some "doozies."
Herb
Anne
Anne Pemberton
[log in to unmask]
http://www.erols.com/apembert
http://www.educationalsynthesis.org
______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions
at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
|