Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:51:31 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Mr. Tarter, does this cover only those who want to re-argue the
paternity question in futile, tedious efforts to persuade their
unpersuadable opponents, or does it _also_ apply more widely to those of
us who are not trying to do that, but who do believe that we see
legitimate other dimensions of Hemings-TJ that warrant discussion? I
hope it's not a baby-and-bathwater thing, in other words. In any case, I
hope I may complete and distribute my response to Mr. Kukla's generously
offered second message about the historiographical dimension that I
engage, the authority of science in the Hemings-TJ debate. Thanks.
Steve Corneliussen
>
>
______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
|
|
|