VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
DRED SCOTT DECISION
From:
Basil Forest <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 9 Mar 2007 14:40:56 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines) 
 
Interestingly, the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit cites Dred Scott  
v. Sandford as precedent in its finding today that DC cannot ban the possession 
 of fire arms by citizens.  See, Parker v. DC DC Cir 04-7041.
 
Looks like Dred Scott remains viable legal precedent, at least as far as  the 
DC Circuit is concerned.
 
I note that the court in dictum finds the decision's aspect of Negroes as  
non citizens as misguided.
 
 

<BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free 
email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free from AOL at 
http://www.aol.com.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US