Elizabeth,
It does seem reasonable that it would have been tobacco. But I recall
reading in an account in a southern apology magazine that it was cotton
warehouses burned in Richmond. Perhaps my memory is faulty. In any event, it
was the confederates who burned Richmond, not the Union army.
Anne
Anne Pemberton
[log in to unmask]http://www.erols.com/stevepemhttp://www.erols.com/apemberthttp://www.educationalsynthesis.org
----- Original Message -----
From: <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 10:18 PM
Subject: Re: Long memories
> If I may insert a thought:
>
> There is some mighty nasty, insulting language being thrown back and
> forth.
> Did someone on this list refer to themselves as intellectuals?
>
> My comprehension must be lacking - tho' I did think there was tobaccy in
> dem
> dere warehouses that we burned in Richmond - not cotton.
>
> Elizabeth
>
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
> at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html