 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) |
| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Mon, 21 May 2007 23:16:12 -0400 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed |
| From: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
To some extent this is all moot. As an anthropologist I accept, at
least until a better theory comes along) the out of Africa
hypothesis. Which of course means if you go back far enough we are
all Africans...
James Brothers, RPA
[log in to unmask]
On May 22, 2007, at 2:41, Anita Wills wrote:
> This reminds me of a nasty message I received from someone who was
> upset that I made a statement about being related to George
> Washington. At first he politely asked a question, but the next
> message showed just how ignorant this person is. He said that George
> Washington had NO Negroes in his family line. I guess he had me mixed
> up with the person who said they were a direct descendant of
> Washington. My truth comes from the DNA test that I took (through
> family tree DNA), my research, and those who contacted me (DNA
> cousins), once the results were released. Nothing that I stated
> changes George Washington, or his accomplishments. It is what it is!!
>
> Anita
|
|
|
