Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) |
Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 31 May 2007 21:04:55 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
While like most people I have bias, it was in this context (not
raising hackles) that I find PC to be stiffling. It is impossible to
have a good debate of a topic if only that which is accepted by all
and uncontroversial is voiced. This is also a good recipe for
groupthink.
James Brothers, RPA
[log in to unmask]
On May 31, 2007, at 13:05, qvarizona wrote:
> Regarding the term PC, Jon Kukla wrote,
>
> "In that context, the term was NOT associated with any particular
> point of view or ideology, but rather with what was least likely to
> raise anyone's hackles."
>
> Thinking about this in several contexts, I think that's
> one of the best definitions of the term PC I've come across.
>
> --Joanne
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not
> web links.
|
|
|