Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 8 Mar 2003 13:45:26 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The commentary of JDS on ex parte Merryman and Lincoln's policies and
views during the war diverges so dramatically from the facts and judgments
of legal/constitutional historians who have written about these matters
that I think it best to refer list subscribers to some of the relevant
works (if they should want to investigate what actually happened in
greater detail):
Harold M. Hyman, A More Perfect Union
Mark E. Neely, Jr., The Fate of Liberty
The suggestion that Lincoln acted like a tyrant or king, abusing his
powers because he had the military backing to do so, is a caricature of
the historical record. His talents as a leader and his moral probity have
been acknowledged by conservatives (e.g., Russell Kirk, Richard Weaver) as well
as centrists and liberals.
Douglas Deal
Professor of History (on leave 2002-2003)
State University of New York at Oswego
Oswego, NY 13126
[log in to unmask]
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
|
|
|