Mime-Version: |
1.0 (1.0) |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
Date: |
Wed, 22 May 2013 12:27:10 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
<DD9AA49B166CE441AC915BD80970B6260E97BAFF@COVMSGCES-MBX12> |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thanks, Brent, for posting this. Just last week I spent three days at Harvard's Houghton Library. On arrival, to my great surprise, I learned that the library has a 50-image limit on digital photos, which threw all my plans into a cocked hat. Their website, which I had read carefully before traveling up there, says some limitations on copying may apply; but on arrival I was shown a separate web page, not linked to the main Houghton page, which sets out the strict 50-image limit. Over that, you must pay $1 per image and order the copies through the library copying service, which is an onerous and very time-consuming process. That being said, the library staff was extremely helpful and I got a lot of terrific material. Library policies vary. At Dartmouth I shot hundreds of images in one day. I don't think UVA imposes a limit.
The text analysis software mentioned in the NYT article is useless on handwritten documents, which is what many of us deal with. It is a myth that in olden days people had great handwriting.
Henry Wiencek
______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
|
|
|