Hi All,
I think Aristotle argued in his Politics, that there were natural
slaves (including barbarians, [whose language, not being classic
Greek, sounded like "bar-bar"]) and natural masters. He did
concede, as I remember it from 30-35 years ago, that the actual
masters and slaves in his society might not be equivalent to the
"natural."
Date sent: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 08:55:51 -0800
From: Kathleen Much <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Generalizing Problems
To: [log in to unmask]
Send reply to: Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history
<[log in to unmask]>
> Mario said:
>
> I do not recall ever coming across any ancient arguments that slaves
> were slaves because it was their natural condition to be subservient,
> because they were less than human, because their brains were simpler or
> more primitive, because they were happier being slaves and taken care of.
> ---
>
> I can't put my finger on the citation just now, but I think Aristotle said
> the barbarians of his day were inferior to the Greeks and born to be
> slaves.
>
> Maybe somebody with better access to references will be able to cite
> the precise quotation.
>
> Kathleen Much
> [log in to unmask]
>
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
> at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
Harold S. Forsythe
Assistant Professor History
Director: Black Studies
Fairfield University
Fairfield, CT 06430-5195
(203) 254-4000 x2379
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
|