Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 13 Oct 2014 09:44:32 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I've been rolling through the Virginia Chronicle site, digging out
various and sundry news articles about the Virginia Polytechnic
Institute around the turn of the last century. I have also been
dealing with the "Correct this Text" process* to clean up articles I
have run across. These articles have obvious typos and other errors --
typically a missing letter in a word or transposed letters, plus the
occasional misspelled name. In most cases, I'll leave it as it is and
add [sic] to indicate that the error is in the original text and not
an error in the correct. My question is if this is the appropriate
process, to leave things as they are.
*The line-by-line correction is tedious at best, especially when the
text is more errors than clean words. I came up with a slightly better
process, although not perfect. I select the text to be corrected, copy
it, and paste it into a BBEdit document (the greatest text editor for
Macintosh). I can then use search-and-replace, spelling check, and
general editing to clean up the text. Once done, I go back to the
Chronicle page, click "Correct this Text" and select the article, then
delete line by line the bad text. I then drag and drop from the BBEdit
document to the Chronicle page until all the correct text has
completely replaced the original OCR scan. Still a little tedious but
a little quicker and easier than line-by-line. The perfect solution
would be a way to drop the whole corrected article in as a whole
instead of piece by piece.
Bruce in Blacksburg
Bruce Harper
University Relations/Web Communications
101-D Media Building
101 Draper Rd. NW
Blacksburg, VA 24060
540-231-4360
______________________________________
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe please see the instructions at
http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
|
|
|