VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Constantine Gutzman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:55:47 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Actually, contrary to what JDS says, the Constitution does not clearly
indicate that habeas corpus can only be suspended by act of Congress.  That
is an inference some people have drawn from the fact that the relevant
language -- "The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be
suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety
may require it. " -- appears in Article I, the Legislative Branch article.
President Lincoln, believing that he faced an emergency, acted to suspend
habeas corpus without first calling Congress into special session; Congress
(if my memory serves) subsequently validated this act retrospectively.

Since in the 19th century Congress rarely met and transportation from
distant states was slow, Lincoln can be forgiven for his Hamiltonian
conclusion that this power was implicit in the Constitution.  (Cf. Walling,
_Republican Empire_)  His argument that he could rightfully do this
certainly was no weaker than the one that said, also despite the absence of
langauge making it explicit, that states had a right to secede.

Prof. K.R. Constantine Gutzman
Department of History
Western Connecticut State University

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US