VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 20 Sep 2002 14:23:56 -0400
Reply-To:
Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-transfer-encoding:
quoted-printable
From:
Clifford Tobias <[log in to unmask]>
Comments:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (82 lines)
I agree with James Hershman's recommendation to consult Leonard White's The
Jacksonians.   There may  be personnel rosters in the State Department
records possessed by NARA.   You would need to check the Record Group(s)
for the State Department.    McLane's entry in the 1933 edition ofThe
Dictionary of American Biographycites what may well be a useful source:
Gaillard Hunt,The Department of State, 1914.  The bureaucracies of the
Cabinet departments were very small in the ante bellumperiod, so it should
not be too difficult to identify the unnamed "undermessenger."    If U.S.
District Attorneys were involved in such matters as manumission disputes,
you might have to consult their records. (The USDA for the District of
Columbia in 1833 was Francis Scott Key -- whose brother-in-law was Roger B.
Taney, Attorney General and then Secretary of the Treasury in that year).
White's volumes emphasize how closely interrelated were the members of  the
higher civil service in early America.   Given the patronage policy of the
Jackson Administration, I would speculate that McLane's "undermessenger"
could have been a fellow Delawarean, albeit of a lower social status.

 Incidently, during my dissertation research -- coincidently focussing on
1833 -- I was amazed to see how quickly correspondence could be "turned
around" by the Washington bureaucrats.    They might respond immediately to
a letter, or even follow up a response sent in the morning with an update
in the afternoon, in time for a later mail pickup.   Correspondence between
D.C. and northern points such as Philadelphia evidently moved with
surprising speed.

I'm a bit puzzled by the State Dept referring to McLane as a "non-career
appointee," although it's literally correct inasmuch as virtually all
Cabinet members are indeed "non-career appointees."

Clifford Tobias, Ph.D.
Philadelphia Support Office
National Park  Service
[log in to unmask]



                                                                                                           
                      Henry Wiencek                                                                        
                      <[log in to unmask]>         To:       [log in to unmask]                         
                      Sent by:                 cc:                                                         
                      Discussion of            Subject:  "Undermessengers" -- what are?                    
                      research and                                                                         
                      writing about                                                                        
                      Virginia history                                                                     
                      <[log in to unmask]                                                                    
                      LIB.VA.US>                                                                           
                                                                                                           
                                                                                                           
                      09/20/2002 12:31                                                                     
                      PM AST                                                                               
                      Please respond to                                                                    
                      Discussion of                                                                        
                      research and                                                                         
                      writing about                                                                        
                      Virginia history                                                                     
                                                                                                           
                                                                                                           




A fellow researcher has turned up a document dated Sept. 13, 1833 from
an unnamed person who identified himself as the "undermessenger" of the
US Secretary of State. Would that have been the lowest-level of gopher?
I'd like to try to identify this person, but I don't know if State Dept.
Records would list "undermessengers." The document is of great interest
as it involved a back-door attempt to manumit a slave. The Secretary on
that date was Louis McLane, a "Non-career appointee," according to the
State Dept. Website, from Delaware.

Henry Wiencek
Charlottesville

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html




To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2


LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US