LISTSERV - VA-HIST Archives - LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

VA-HIST Archives

Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history

VA-HIST@LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US

	LISTSERV Archives
	VA-HIST Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Condense Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Content-transfer-encoding:	7BIT
Sender:	Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:	Re: Court abbreviations
From:	Marilyn Symonds <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Thu, 16 Aug 2001 10:28:51 -0500
MIME-version:	1.0
Content-type:	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Reply-To:	Discussion of research and writing about Virginia history <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (20 lines)

Diana:

I believe the Orange County Order Book notation > Charles & Peter
Copland, Plts. Agt Samuel Kercheville Deft. In Debt > is the "style"
or title of a lawsuit, which in modern usage would probably be styled:

Charles Copland and Peter Copland, Plaintiffs
versus
Samuel Kercheville, Defendant

The notation "In Debt" signifies that the plaintiffs' allegation[s]
were based upon a debt owed to them by the defendant. "Debt" was a
theory of common law providing recovery for those who prevailed in the
lawsuit.

Marilyn Symonds

To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTLVA.LIB.VA.US