Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:11:41 -0600 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed |
Organization: |
University of Tulsa College of Law |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
that is a very odd comment? Doughfaces was a fairly common political
term in the 1850s; surely one of insult, but hardly on the scale of a
racial insult. After all, being a member of a particular race is not
something anyone has any control over; but Buchanan or Pierce were not
born as proslavery northern democrats ("northern men with southern
principles" is the best definition of a doughface); they chose that
path. Doughface is the proper description for them.
Paul FInkelman
Joan Logan Brooks wrote:
> Whose prejudice is showing now?
>
> FYI, Prof. Finkelman, "doughfaces" is as insulting as the "n" word.
>
> Joan Logan Brooks
>
> To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
> at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
>
--
Paul Finkelman
Chapman Distinguished Professor
University of Tulsa College of Law
3120 East 4th Place
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74104-2499
918-631-3706 (office)
918-631-2194 (fax)
[log in to unmask]
To subscribe, change options, or unsubscribe, please see the instructions
at http://listlva.lib.va.us/archives/va-hist.html
|
|
|