I'm not at all wondering about Thomas leaving a baby girl behind in
England; it's just that I had never heard of him being married before
he married in Virginia and sired Jane, who married a Bolling and
began the Virginia line; let alone having left a child behind, who
evidently grew to adulthood, married, and had children of her own. I
had never heard of any Pochahontas line except the Virginia one. But
it would seem there is also a British one.
As I understand it, the young Thomas (about 4 years old) was sickly,
too, along with his mother (who, of course, died) and his father
believed he would never survive the voyage back to Va. and so he was
left under the care of Sir Lewis Stuckeley (who may have been a less
than sterling figure); he was later taken and cared for by his uncle,
Henry Rolfe, who was also a member of the Virginia Company. In 1622
Henry petitioned the Virginia Company for money from the estate of
his brother John, to pay for his expenses in raising Thomas. John
Rolfe died in 1622, possibly a victim of the 1622 massacre, but there
is no hard evidence for this that I know of. He's not named in the
listing of settlers who died then, but maybe he was wounded and died
later. Most sources seem to assume his death was due to the massacre.
He had a daughter by his third wife (I think the girl's name was
Elizabeth) who was last found in records at age 4. So who knows what
happened to her? She would have survived the massacre, though.
Thomas' great-uncle Opechcanough left him extensive lands in
Virginia; when Thomas returned to Va. he met with the tribe, and
evidently decided the native life was not for him. Supposedly the
descendants of John Rolfe are the only people descended from any of
those who were at the first general assembly at Jamestown in 1619.
All the other lines died out.
check out http://www.rootsweb.com/~albutler/families/rolfe.htm for a
very extensive look at the Rolfe family, here and in GB, and for the
British side of the family, http://www.threlkeld.org.uk/
Pocahontas.htm If you Google John Rolfe or Thomas Rolfe, you will
have tons of information.
Nancy
-------
I was never lost, but I was bewildered once for three days.
--Daniel Boone
On Mar 14, 2007, at 11:55 AM, harriott lomax wrote:
> It would not have been unusual for a man to leave his child behind
> at that time. Men were the ones taking care of the business of
> family & state' That business very often took them away from home
> for extended periods. If the wife died a female relative would step
> in to take care of the children, she could be his sister her
> sister, or a brothers wife.
>
> There are instances where the man would marry scandlously soon
> after his wife died more than likely because he needed someone to
> take care of the children. Records tell us that Henry Wetherburn, a
> tavern keeper in Williamsburg married Ann Shields, daughter of a
> tavern keeper with in a month after his wife died. Betsy Harrison,
> a niece of Elizabeth (Harrison) Randolph, came to live with her
> Uncle Peyton and Aunt Betty in Williamsburg soon after her mother
> died, Her sister Ann was sent to live with her Aunt Ann (Harrison)
> Randolph at Wilton near Richmond. So for Thomas to leave his child
> behind, was doing what was necessary for a man of business.
>
> Harriott Lomax
> Retired CWF
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
|